Talk:Kai's Villain List: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Falco, we have our disagreements but I don't have any reason to believe that you're corrupt. As far as I'm aware, you're a good worker. That is why you are not on the list.<br\> | Falco, we have our disagreements but I don't have any reason to believe that you're corrupt. As far as I'm aware, you're a good worker. That is why you are not on the list.<br\> | ||
--[[User:Kaimetsu|Kai]] 19:00, 1 Mar 2005 (CET) | --[[User:Kaimetsu|Kai]] 19:00, 1 Mar 2005 (CET) | ||
Ok, good to hear.<br\> | |||
[[Falco10291029]] | |||
Revision as of 13:06, 1 March 2005
I wholeheartedly agree with the comments about Houdiniman. I've had several experiences qwith him myself. he was going to delete elemental kingdoms because we had a small platform that looked remotely like one on UN XD. Also what made you decide not to add me, or is this just those who you have seen make corrupt acts, which I havent done?<br\> Falco10291029
Well, it is a villain list. I assume that you are just not evil enough to warrant inclusion. GrowlZ 18:20, 1 Mar 2005 (CET)
Well Kai constantly talks about me being incompetent and such, or at least suggests it. And yes, i'm not evil or corrupted so i geuss that's why.<br\> Falco10291029 p.s. GrowlZ, whats the point of doing UserGrowlz|Growlz if your user page redirects to Growlz....
Falco, we have our disagreements but I don't have any reason to believe that you're corrupt. As far as I'm aware, you're a good worker. That is why you are not on the list.<br\> --Kai 19:00, 1 Mar 2005 (CET)
Ok, good to hear.<br\> Falco10291029